When you see an ad criticizing a candidate on immigration, security, or the economy, the group financing it may have a very different goal: influencing US foreign policy.
This is the case with AIPAC, an American organization that promotes political support for Israel and whose super PAC, United Democracy Project (UDP), has intervened in legislative elections.
The Difference: The criticism in an ad may refer to real facts, but it does not necessarily explain why an organization decided to invest millions in that election.
AIPAC is an American organization, not the Israeli government. There is no evidence presented here that Israel directly funded these ads.
Super PACs can make virtually unlimited independent electoral expenditures, subject to disclosure requirements and other legal restrictions.
Elected representatives make decisions on immigration, education, health, and budgets, but also on military aid and foreign policy.
Knowing who funds political ads and campaigns helps voters evaluate the interests involved in elections, even when the ads focus exclusively on local issues.
If an ad talks about immigration but is funded by an organization focused on foreign policy, do you have enough information to understand why it is intervening in your election?
